In-Depth Topics for Expert & Institutional Consideration


This section provides a deeper look into the architecture, long-term behavior, and governance of the Aishe system. We welcome these discussions as they are critical to building long-term, trust-based partnerships.


Q: How does the system's performance evolve during highly volatile market phases or "black swan" events? Are there documented results?

A: This is a core aspect of our design philosophy. AISHE is engineered for robustness, not just fair-weather performance.

  • Behavior During Volatility: During extreme volatility, the "Human Factor" in our "Knowledge Balance Sheet" model typically becomes overwhelmingly dominant. The AI is trained to recognize these phases of fear- or greed-driven irrationality. Its primary response is to reduce risk. This may mean it stops opening new positions, reduces trade sizes, or utilizes wider stop-loss parameters to avoid being whipsawed by chaotic price swings. Its goal in such phases shifts from profit maximization to capital preservation.
  • Documented Results: While we do not publish a public track record for reasons stated earlier, our internal development includes rigorous "crisis performance analysis." We continuously simulate how our current and past models would have navigated historical black swan events (e.g., the 2008 financial crisis, the SNB franc shock of 2015, the COVID-19 crash of 2020). These simulations are a critical part of our internal validation and evolution process, ensuring the AI's risk management protocols are effective under maximum stress.

 

 

Q: How do you ensure that even pseudonymized "neural states" within the Collective Intelligence model cannot be reverse-engineered to reveal individual strategies?

A: This is a valid and sophisticated security concern. Our approach to protecting individual user privacy within the collective learning model is multi-layered:

  • Aggregation and Anonymization: The data used by our Main System is not just a collection of individual trade results. It is a highly aggregated and anonymized data set. We do not analyze "User A's trades"; we analyze the statistical performance of "Forecast - Symbol - state  #DD.MM.JJJJ HH:MM" across anonymous instances under different conditions.
  • Differential Privacy: We implement principles of differential privacy, a technique where statistical noise is intentionally added to the aggregated data set. This makes it mathematically impossible to isolate or identify the contribution of any single user, even with advanced statistical analysis.
  • Focus on the Model, Not the User: The goal of the collective intelligence is to improve our central AI's forecasting model, not to analyze or copy a user's specific settings or success. The learning is on our side, to provide better strategic parameters to everyone. There is no horizontal data exchange between users.

 

 

Q: Explainability vs. Complexity: How user-friendly is the interpretation of the AI's decision trails for non-experts in practice?

A: We acknowledge the "black box" problem of complex AI. While we cannot provide a simple "if-then" reason for every decision, we are committed to providing interpretable insights. The AISHE client provides a dashboard that visualizes key metrics in real time:

  • Factor Dominance: The user can see a graphical representation of which of the three factors (Human, Structural, Relational) the AI is currently weighting most heavily. This gives a clear, intuitive understanding of the AI's "assessment" of the current market character.
  • Forecast Half-Life: This metric acts as a "confidence score." A short half-life indicates the AI believes the current market condition is unstable and its forecast is only valid for a very short period. A longer half-life suggests a more stable, predictable environment.
    While this doesn't explain the decision at a neuron-by-neuron level, it provides the user with a practical, high-level understanding of the AI's reasoning, empowering them to agree with or override the system's general stance (e.g., by pausing it).

 

 

Q: What specific hardware and network infrastructure is required for optimal real-time performance?

A: For maximum performance and stability, we recommend an infrastructure that minimizes latency and processing bottlenecks. The minimum requirements (e.g., Windows OS, i7 processor) ensure basic functionality. The recommended setup for a professional user is:

  • Dedicated Machine: A dedicated, high-performance PC or a Virtual Private Server (VPS) located in a major data center (e.g., London, New York, Frankfurt) close to the user's broker's servers.
  • Hardware: A modern multi-core processor (e.g., Intel i9/Ryzen 9), at least 16GB of high-speed RAM, and a solid-state drive (SSD).
  • Network: A stable, low-latency internet connection. For VPS users, the cross-connect within the data center is ideal.
This setup ensures that the local AISHE client can process the strategic data from our Main System and the high-frequency market data from the broker without delay.

 

 

Q: Are there expert opinions or statements from independent third parties regarding the system's applicability for different market segments?

A: As a system that has been developed with a focus on product maturity before seeking broad public validation, we are now in the phase of engaging with independent experts and select institutions. We are actively seeking technical due diligence and model validation from reputable third parties in the FinTech and AI space. Results and expert opinions from these engagements will be made public as they become available and confidentiality agreements permit. Currently, AISHE is positioned for the sophisticated retail and prosumer market. Applicability for institutional segments is a key part of our future roadmap. 

 

Further Suggestions Addressed:

  • Conflicting Market Signals ("Edge Cases"): When the AI's analysis results in conflicting signals with low confidence (e.g., all three factors are pulling in different directions with no clear dominance), its protocol is to default to a risk-off position. It will refrain from opening new trades until a clearer market state emerges. Every decision, especially in such "edge cases," is logged with the corresponding factor weights and forecast half-life, providing a transparent audit trail for later review.
  • Ongoing Updates and Maintenance: Security and transparency are not static. We conduct regular internal and planned external security audits of our infrastructure. The AISHE client has an auto-update feature to ensure all users benefit immediately from security patches and performance improvements. All significant changes to the system's logic or data handling processes are communicated to our users and distributors via our official channels.
  • Testability of Improvements: Every major update to our Main System's AI model is first deployed in a sandboxed, live-market simulation environment where its performance is benchmarked against the current production model for a statistically significant period. An update is only rolled out to users if it demonstrates a clear and consistent improvement in performance and/or risk management against this neutral baseline.

 

#buttons=(Ok, Go it!) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Check Now
Ok, Go it!