AISHE: A Comprehensive Expert Report

(toc) #title=(Table of Content)

The AISHE (Artificial Intelligence System Highly Experienced) represents a fundamental paradigm shift in AI-driven trading. It goes beyond simply providing trading signals and makes fully autonomous decisions within user-defined parameters. This approach addresses critical problems in financial trading by eliminating the need for human interpretation and the associated execution delays.

AISHE's unique market positioning is based on several core features: First, it is characterized by a decentralized, client-based architecture that ensures local data processing and comprehensive user control. Second, the project is supported by a remarkable self-financing model, developed over 16 years, which makes it independent of external investors and their short-term return expectations. This strategic independence represents a significant competitive advantage, as it enables a long-term focus on technological development and strategic decision-making without being subject to the pressure of short-term profitability. This allows AISHE to prioritize its unique decentralized and user-centric features, which might be less attractive to traditional investors seeking centralized, rapidly scalable solutions.

AISHE's value creation is multifaceted and extends beyond individual financial returns. The system aims to democratize access to financial markets and transform the nature of work by creating new forms of economic participation. The project is currently at a strategic transition point, as the founder seeks a successor and simultaneously builds a global distributor network to scale its reach. Overall, AISHE positions itself as a robust and responsible AI solution with significant potential, closely aligned with European AI principles, although performance depends on the user's individual hardware requirements.

 


 

1. AISHE Project Overview: Vision, Objectives and Business Model

 

1. Definition of AISHE: Autonomous AI Trading System

AISHE, known as an "Artificial Intelligence System Highly Experienced," is a groundbreaking autonomous trading system that fundamentally changes the way financial transactions are conducted. Unlike conventional systems that merely provide trading signals that must then be manually interpreted and executed, AISHE makes fully autonomous decisions within user-defined parameters. This approach eliminates the human error and latency associated with manual execution, thus addressing critical problems in financial trading.

At the heart of AISHE's decision-making process is its proprietary "Knowledge Balance Sheet 2.0," with its unique three-tiered decision architecture. This architecture fundamentally distinguishes AISHE from traditional systems, which often only analyze technical indicators. Every decision is broken down into three comprehensible components:

  • The human factor: This factor quantifies collective behavioral patterns of traders rather than relying on vague terms like "market sentiment." Through continuous, real-time analysis, AISHE identifies specific, recurring behavioral patterns - for example, a sudden increase in stop-loss orders during a specific time frame - and highlights how these patterns indicate upcoming market moves. For non-technical users, this information is presented in understandable terms, such as "Traders exhibit increasing risk aversion with increasing volume," rather than complex statistical metrics. 
  • The structural factor: This aspect makes the underlying market infrastructure that influenced a decision transparent. AISHE not only demonstrates that a decision has been made, but also explains how real-time liquidity conditions, order book depth, or technical chart patterns at the time of the decision influenced it. These explanations are contextualized and not limited to quantitative jargon, ensuring comprehensibility for a wider audience. 
  • The relationship factor: This illustrates the dynamic interactions between different markets and asset classes that led to a decision. Instead of presenting complex correlation coefficients, AISHE, for example, illustrates how a change in the commodity markets is likely to affect the currency markets, clearly outlining the causal relationship. 

The Knowledge Balance 2.0 Framework is not just a function, but the core of AISHE's intellectual property. Its ability to conduct structured, multi-dimensional market analysis and identify causal relationships provides a deeper and more actionable understanding of complex market dynamics. This is crucial for autonomous systems operating in inherently uncertain financial environments and represents a significant barrier to entry for potential competitors. The transparency enabled by this model, by explaining complex decisions in understandable terms, is also crucial for building user trust and meeting regulatory requirements for AI transparency.

Another innovative aspect is AISHE's transparent handling of hardware dependencies. The system explicitly shows the user how the available computing power influences the complexity of the state analysis and which decisions may be more conservative because the hardware cannot recognize more complex patterns in real time. Ultimately, AISHE is not a signal generator, but an autonomous decision-maker whose transparency lies in the fact that the user can understand at any time

why a decision was made based on these three factors. The level of explainability is adjustable, from simple summaries for beginners to detailed technical analyses for experienced users. 

 

1.2 Core vision and strategic pillars

 

The development of AISHE is the result of over 16 years of passionate and dedicated work by the development team. The core vision was clear from the outset: to create a system that revolutionizes how people interact with financial markets, transforms passive systems into active agents, and ushers in a new era of economic participation. This long-term commitment underscores the deep confidence in the project's transformative potential.

AISHE’s growth strategy rests on several closely linked and mutually reinforcing pillars:

  • Global expansion through a decentralized distribution model: AISHE pursues a global expansion strategy based on a decentralized distribution model. Currently, distributors are in the development and registration phase in various countries, including Singapore, India, Turkey, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, and France. This model operates according to a "franchise-like" principle, with local distributors operating independently in their respective markets and bearing their own costs for sales, marketing, and support. This offers significant advantages to the central unit: There are no additional costs for expansion, the revenue generated by distributors remains with the company as profit, and the model enables virtually unlimited scalability without additional centralized overhead. The operational burden for sales, employee management, and customer service remains entirely with the distributors. This decentralized approach is not just a cost savings but a strategic necessity for a project that has deliberately avoided external capital. It enables exponential global growth without diluting the ownership structure or incurring debt. The model is particularly effective for a product like AISHE, which benefits from local language support, navigation through nuanced regulatory frameworks, and direct, culturally sensitive customer outreach, leveraging regional expertise without increasing core operational or financial risk.
  • Technological development and innovation: AISHE strives to become the leading platform for AI-powered trading. Future development will focus on delivering new features, entering new markets, and continuously improving the system's transparency, security, and regulatory compliance. This ongoing innovation is ensured by dynamic learning frameworks such as reinforcement learning, transfer learning, and federated learning. These multi-layered approaches enable the system to continuously adapt to new market situations, process diverse data streams, and refine its decision-making processes without constant human intervention. 
  • Democratizing access to financial markets: A central pillar of the growth strategy is democratizing access to sophisticated financial markets. AISHE is designed to run on a standard Windows PC and requires only moderate computing resources. This gives retail investors access to institutional trading strategies previously reserved only for professional market participants with extensive infrastructure. This approach transforms market efficiency and significantly reduces information asymmetry between large investors and retail investors. 

 

1.3 The self-sustaining business model (SaaS/AIaaS, distributor network)

 

AISHE's business model is innovative and characterized by its sustainability, scalability, and social relevance. Over 16 years, AISHE has built a closed, self-sustaining ecosystem that is both economically and socially sustainable. 

  • Revenue model: AISHE is primarily offered as a Software as a Service (SaaS) or Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS) subscription model. After a mandatory 14-day trial period, which allows all interested parties to thoroughly evaluate the system before making a purchase decision, users pay a monthly fee for system usage. This trial period builds confidence in the product and minimizes return requests, generating a continuous and stable cash flow. This is complemented by customized package offers as well as reseller and referral programs that are actively marketed through the local distribution network. 
  • Financial Independence: A remarkable feature of AISHE is its remarkable financial independence. The project has been entirely self-financed for 16 years, beginning under the name "Highway." Revenues from early subscriptions were directly reinvested to cover ongoing operating costs, establishing a sustainable financing model from the outset. The project has deliberately avoided external investors (such as venture capital) and loans to maintain its strategic independence and avoid external pressure for short-term profits. The founder retains sole ownership and has personally led development for 16 years, ensuring a consistent vision and committed leadership. Over a period of 15 years, approximately €12 million was invested in building the necessary IT infrastructure, with a focus on purchasing high-performance hardware for the data centers. This substantial investment explicitly excludes personnel and other operating costs. The entire funding comes primarily from the founder's personal income, which in turn was generated through the successful operation and use of the AISHE system itself. The financial structure is dynamically adaptable: Should revenues temporarily decline, ongoing operating costs are adjusted accordingly to ensure financial stability without external dependence. This flexible approach has enabled the project to remain stable for over 15 years. 
  • Distributor network: A central component of the growth model is the global distributor network. Local distributors market customized package deals, as well as reseller and referral programs, operating entirely independently in their respective countries. This model is extremely efficient because it maximizes profits for the central unit by shifting operational costs and risks (e.g., sales, marketing, local support, taxes, human resources management) to the local partners, while the revenue generated by the distributor remains as profit for the central company. 
  • Marketing Strategy: The marketing strategy utilizes various channels to increase AISHE's global awareness, including Google Ads, YouTube, and other video marketing platforms. This strategy is adapted and implemented by local distributors according to the specific conditions and cultural nuances of their respective markets. 

 

2. Technological and operational in-depth view



2. Data paradigm: real-time, state vectors and Knowledge Balance Sheet 2.0

 

AISHE operates with a data paradigm that is fundamentally different from conventional trading systems. It explicitly eschews traditional historical data and instead relies exclusively on real-time data and its self-generated 18-digit numerical "state vectors," which are dynamic representations of current market situations. This approach represents a radical departure from traditional systems that rely heavily on historical databases for training and operation.

The system processes three specific data categories that are inextricably linked to the Knowledge Balance Sheet 2.0 framework:

  • Human Factor: This involves the real-time analysis of quantifiable patterns in collective trader behavior. AISHE continuously identifies recurring behavioral patterns (e.g., order flow, trading volume distribution, microstructure behavior) that indicate upcoming market movements. All of this data is collected and processed in real time, without storing historical data. Indicators of collective risk appetite and emotional market tendencies are derived from current market dynamics using machine learning. 
  • Structural Factor: This refers to the real-time analysis of the market infrastructure, including the dynamic assessment of liquidity conditions, order book depth, and execution speed. AISHE processes these as constantly changing parameters that directly feed into decision-making. This enables the system to detect and respond to structural market anomalies in real time, without relying on predefined chart patterns. 
  • Relationship Factor: This analyzes the dynamic interactions between different asset classes and macroeconomic factors. Unlike systems based on static correlation tables, AISHE continuously creates updated relationship patterns by analyzing simultaneous market movements and uses these evolving state vectors for its decision-making. 

AISHE primarily uses the Seneca system and its analyses from the "Information Market," which is closely linked to the Knowledge Market. The Seneca crawler system provides permanently updated data from news and internet sources, which is continuously evaluated. Real-time data is obtained via various protocols, primarily DDE (Dynamic Data Exchange) and RTD (Real-Time Data), as well as APIs from the connected trading platforms on the user's local computer. Typical platforms for this are MetaTrader 4 or other broker platforms that provide users with classic charts and other services. 

Data quality is ensured by AISHE's decentralized, client-based architecture. Since each AISHE system runs locally on the user's hardware, data processing occurs without transmission via central servers, ensuring the integrity of real-time data. The system implements multi-layered validation, automatically identifying anomalous market movements and excluding them from decision-making. 

The paradigm of not using traditional historical data is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it avoids systematic biases that could result from past market situations and enables continuous adaptation to current, evolving market conditions. On the other hand, the lack of extensive historical datasets for initial training or baseline validation presents a unique challenge. Conventional AI models benefit immensely from large historical datasets to identify robust and generalizable patterns. AISHE's reliance on reinforcement learning and federated learning therefore becomes absolutely crucial to compensate for this. This implies that each user's individual AISHE instance must effectively "learn from scratch" in real time or from the collective, anonymized learning of other AISHE instances. This leads to a potentially longer initial "training phase" for each user's system to achieve optimal performance, as explicitly emphasized by the need for "intensive training and careful configuration" over "days or weeks" to achieve high returns. The "demo money" validation phase 1 is thus not just a function, but a critical component of this individual experiential learning process.

 

2.2 System architecture: Decentralized, local client integration

 

AISHE operates as a fully decentralized, local client, installed directly on the user's computer and connecting to their existing trading infrastructure. This approach is consistent with AISHE's autonomous nature and ensures optimal performance under the user's specific conditions.

Integration is primarily enabled through DDE, RTD, and API connections, which ensure seamless communication between AISHE and the trading platforms. The connection is typically already configured during the initial setup of the AISHE system. 

All data processing takes place exclusively locally on the user's hardware. This decentralized processing eliminates the need to send data to central servers, significantly improving data security and ensuring the speed critical for autonomous decision-making. 

It is crucial to understand that AISHE only needs access to the user's trading account to place orders. The regulatory responsibility for providing access to the exchange lies with licensed brokers (e.g., BaFin). AISHE only uses the access granted to the user by the broker and only trades the symbols the broker makes available to the user. 

The "1 computer = 1 AISHE" principle is a central aspect of the architecture. It allows users with multiple computers to run multiple independent AISHE instances simultaneously. Each of these instances can have its own instrument selection, parameter configuration, and trading strategy, offering virtually unlimited combination possibilities. 

 

2.3 Learning and adaptation: Reinforcement learning, federated learning, hardware-dependent optimization

 

AISHE’s ability to continuously adapt and improve is anchored in its dynamic learning framework:

  • Reinforcement Learning (RL): AISHE implements RL to continuously learn from the consequences of its own decisions. The system receives rewards or penalties for specific trading decisions, allowing it to learn which decisions are optimal in specific situations without relying on traditional chart analysis. This dynamic process ensures the system's continuous adaptation. 
  • Federated Learning: A key aspect of AISHE's learning framework is federated learning. Multiple AISHE instances can share knowledge - more specifically, model updates, non-sensitive raw data - with a central aggregator. The aggregated model then improves the performance of each individual client, enabling collective system improvement while preserving user privacy and data security. 
  • Hardware-dependent optimization: AISHE dynamically adapts its data processing depth, the complexity of its state analysis, and even its trading activity to the user's hardware capabilities. For example, slower computers with older CPU generations may struggle to process complex neural states in real time. AISHE does not view this as a limitation, but rather as a conscious design decision: It adapts by pursuing more conservative, lower-complexity strategies to ensure decisions can be made within the available processing time, thus ensuring functionality under all hardware conditions. This approach, leveraging hardware dependency as a core feature, redefines the concept of "performance" in algorithmic trading. The focus shifts from a universal, absolute performance metric to optimizing performance
    relative to available computing resources . This significantly increases accessibility and promotes the "democratization" of access to financial markets, as users don't have to invest in high-end hardware to use the system, although better hardware obviously enables higher potential returns. This approach also distributes the computational load and associated energy costs from a centralized server infrastructure to individual users, consistent with decentralized principles. The result is a highly personalized AI experience, with each AISHE instance uniquely "tuned" and optimized for its specific operating environment.

 

2.4 Scalability and security framework

 

  • Scalability: AISHE revolutionizes the concept of scalability through its decentralized scaling architecture. Instead of relying on centralized server capacity like traditional systems, AISHE scales through physical hardware expansion, according to the principle "1 computer = 1 AISHE." This means that an increase in the number of user computers directly increases the system's overall processing and trading capacity. This architecture enables the creation of specialized AISHE instances, such as conservative systems for volatile periods, aggressive systems for trend-oriented markets, or experimental setups for testing new strategies. AISHE's architectural elegance eliminates the traditional trade-off between sophisticated analysis and execution speed by offering both simultaneously through distributed intelligence. 
  • Security: AISHE transforms its decentralized architecture into a centralized security advantage, distancing itself from dependence on centralized security infrastructures. Because the system runs locally on the user's hardware and all critical decisions are made on the local computer, there is no single centralized target that would be attractive to hackers. All data processing and AI activities take place exclusively on the user's device, meaning that personal or financial data is never transferred to external servers. 
  • Local data processing: This forms the foundation of the security architecture, as it eliminates the risk of data leaks during transmission and protects against centralized attacks on server infrastructures. The user's hardware thus becomes the primary security anchor. 
  • Encryption: All data transfers between AISHE and the trading platforms are encrypted using AES-256, a technology considered bank-safe. This encryption also applies to the local storage of all critical information on the user's device. 
  • Access protection: Security is based on a precise role model that adapts to hardware capabilities. More complex security protocols can be implemented on powerful hardware, while more conservative, yet still effective, security measures are deliberately used on older systems. 
  • Firewall & IDS/IPS: Integrated firewall mechanisms filter network traffic and block unwanted connections, with configurations specifically tailored to the requirements of the financial market. Intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) actively detect and block attacks on the system and continuously learn from various security scenarios to proactively respond to new threats. 
  • Federated Learning: Contributes to collective security intelligence by enabling the sharing of insights into effective security strategies and threat patterns without exposing sensitive user data. 

 

3. Financial viability and performance analysis



3. Financing model: equity financing, capital structure and historical investments

 

The AISHE project is characterized by remarkable financial independence and sustainability, spanning more than 16 years of continuous development. 

  • Self-financing: The project was fully self-financed from the outset, originally under the name "Highway." Revenue from early subscriptions was used directly to cover ongoing operating costs, establishing a sustainable financing model from the outset. 
  • No external capital: The project has deliberately avoided external investors, such as venture capital firms, and has not taken out any loans. This strategic decision was made to maintain independence and avoid external pressure for short-term profits. 
  • Sole Ownership: The project is solely owned by its founder, who has personally led its development for 16 years, ensuring a consistent vision and committed leadership. 
  • Historical investments: Over a period of 15 years, approximately €12 million was invested in building the necessary IT infrastructure, with a focus on purchasing high-performance hardware for the data centers. This substantial investment explicitly excludes personnel and other operating costs. All funding comes primarily from the founder's personal income, which in turn was generated through the successful operation and use of the AISHE system itself. The financial structure is dynamically adaptable: Should revenues temporarily decline, ongoing operating costs are adjusted accordingly to ensure financial stability without external dependence. This flexible approach has enabled the project to remain stable for over 15 years. 
  • Current model: The current financing structure is based on a SaaS/AIaaS model. Users pay a monthly fee for system usage after a mandatory 14-day trial period. This is supplemented by customized package offers as well as reseller and referral programs that are actively marketed through the local distribution network. 
  • Future Financing: No further capital increases are currently planned, as the system is already able to finance its operations and growth independently. Future expansion will primarily be achieved through strategic partnerships with local distributors, who will be responsible for local support, taxes, training, and sales in their respective markets.

 

3.2 Expected returns: user-specific and societal impacts

 

The expected return of the AISHE project is multifaceted, encompassing not only individual user and development team returns, but also broader societal impacts with the potential to transform global labor markets and usher in a new era of economic participation. 

  • User-specific returns: The expected return for individual AISHE users is highly variable and depends on several critical, interrelated factors, including the quality of their hardware, the duration of their training phase, and their user-configured risk parameters. 
  • Illustrative example: A trading report from a real user documented a daily return of 32.8% (corresponding to a net profit of EUR 772.42 from a starting capital of EUR 2,355.79), achieved with a high win factor of 9.75 and 72% profitable trades, with a moderate maximum drawdown of 3.5% of the total capital. However, it is explicitly stated that these results were only achieved through "intensive training and careful configuration of the AISHE system over days or weeks." 
  • Hardware influence: On less powerful hardware, the system deliberately reduces its complexity and risk tolerance, implying more conservative returns. This is a conscious design decision that ensures autonomy under all conditions. 
  • Long-term user perspectives: Long-term benefits for users include continuous performance optimization through learning and the integration of new user experiences (via federated learning), diversification opportunities across different asset classes by operating multiple independent AISHE instances, and the inherent scalability of the system for deployment in larger markets or more complex tasks. 

The initial "training phase" for each individual AISHE instance is a crucial but often underestimated success factor. Since the system operates without historical data, each instance must build its own "experience" and refine its "neural state recognition" in real time. This phase of experiential learning and adaptation, both for the AI and for the user in optimizing the configuration, directly impacts the "hardware utilization efficiency" and the system's ability to achieve its "risk-adjusted trajectory." This challenging initial phase also serves as a natural self-selection mechanism, ensuring that only dedicated and patient users realize the system's full potential. This model fundamentally challenges the "set it and forget it" expectation of automated trading solutions and positions the user as an active "trainer" and "supervisor" of the AI.

  • Societal Impact (Broader Returns): AISHE's true transformative potential goes beyond individual financial returns and aims to create a new form of economic participation and address broader societal challenges. 
  • Democratizing financial markets: AISHE is designed to be accessible on a standard Windows PC and requires only moderate computing resources. This enables retail investors to participate in sophisticated financial markets, thus reducing the information asymmetry that traditionally favors institutional players with extensive infrastructure. 
  • Combating unemployment and creating new forms of work: In the context of global unemployment and the impending AI era, AISHE positions itself as a solution that does not replace jobs but creates new forms of economic participation. It demonstrates that autonomous systems can transform the nature of work from active participation to supervision of autonomous systems. This offers alternative activities for millions of potential users (e.g., students, housewives, teleworkers), thus addressing growing concerns about AI-related job losses. 
  • Collective Improvement: Through federated learning, users train on local data and only share model updates (not raw data) with a central aggregator. This ensures that every user experience contributes to a continuously improving global AI system while maintaining individual data security. 
  • Scalability for billions: Within its AIaaS/SaaS model, the true potential lies in its scalability. With millions of users worldwide, the system could not only generate billions monthly, but also create an entirely new class of "AI-assisted freelancers" who would earn income through AISHE. These users would contribute to economic stability by paying taxes and potentially reducing the burden on social security systems. 

Here, the integration of social benefits is not just a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiative, but an integral part of the business strategy and value proposition. By positioning AISHE as a concrete solution to unemployment and a tool for economic participation, it taps into a vast, potentially underserved global market of individuals seeking flexible and accessible income-generating opportunities. This expands the potential user base far beyond traditional financial traders and makes the ambitious projections of "millions of users worldwide" and "billions monthly" in revenue more plausible. The "future of work" narrative offers a compelling, forward-looking vision that could attract diverse talent, strategic partners, and possibly even favorable regulatory or government attention in an era increasingly affected by the impact of AI on the labor market. It transforms a niche financial product into a tool for broader social empowerment and economic inclusion.

 

3.3 Performance Metrics: Beyond Traditional Benchmarks

 

AISHE's performance evaluation cannot be adequately captured by traditional metrics such as return on investment (ROI) or Sharpe ratio. This is due to its fundamental design as an autonomous agent operating within the computational resources available to it, resulting in highly customized and hardware-dependent performance. 

Performance must therefore be evaluated relative to the available hardware, similar to comparing the performance of a VW Beetle with a Formula 1 car. A user with an older CPU will achieve different results than a user with modern hardware, yet both can be considered successful when performance is evaluated relative to their specific conditions. The key difference from traditional trading systems is that AISHE does not aim for maximum absolute returns, but rather for making the best possible decisions within the available processing time. 

The relevant metrics for AISHE are therefore:

  • Neural State Recognition Score: This measures how accurately the system identifies the complex neural states that correspond to the current market conditions for each trading symbol. This metric is particularly hardware-dependent; on more powerful hardware, AISHE can detect more complex states, while on older systems, complexity is deliberately reduced. 
  • Decision latency: This quantifies the time between the detection of a neural state and the execution of a trading decision. This metric is crucial for understanding whether the system can operate effectively under the given hardware conditions, especially in volatile markets. 
  • Adaptive learning rate: This measures how effectively the system learns from its own decisions and adapts its strategies. This occurs through reinforcement learning, in which the system receives rewards or penalties for specific decisions and continuously refines its approach. 
  • Hardware utilization efficiency: This evaluates how optimally the system utilizes the available computing power. On less powerful hardware, AISHE deliberately adjusts its complexity to ensure decisions can be made within the required time, thereby optimizing operational efficiency within the given constraints. 
  • Risk-adjusted trajectory: This evaluates the system's progress toward user-defined financial goals, taking into account individual risk parameters and specific hardware conditions. This metric provides a holistic view of performance tailored to the user's setup. 

The following tables summarize key financial metrics of the AISHE project and sample performance indicators for a single AISHE client. These performance indicators are intended as illustrative and depend heavily on the individual hardware conditions and training intensity of the user.

Table 1: Financial overview of the AISHE project (overall project)

Key figure

Value

Notes

Total development time

16+ years

 

Total investment in IT infrastructure (over 15 years)

~€12 million

Excl. personnel and other operating costs

Primary source of funding

Exclusively private funds

Self-financing through system use

External capital (venture capital, loans)

€0

 

Table 2: Example performance indicators of a single AISHE client (Illustrative)

Key figure

Value

Notes

Example net profit per day (optimal conditions)

772.42 EUR

From 2,355.79 EUR starting capital

Example daily return (optimal conditions)

32.8%

Requires intensive training and configuration

Example profit factor (optimal conditions)

9.75

Gross profit: EUR 860.66 / Gross loss: EUR 88.24

Example profitable trades % (optimal conditions)

72%

 

Example of maximum drawdown (optimal conditions)

82.87 EUR

3.5% of total capital

 

4. Regulatory compliance and ethical considerations



4. Alignment with EU AI Act principles and data protection (GDPR)

 

AISHE addresses regulatory compliance through a fundamental understanding of its role in the financial ecosystem: It does not act as a standalone market participant, but as a decentralized decision-maker that integrates seamlessly into existing, regulated infrastructures. 

  • Decentralized architecture for compliance: AISHE's operating model, in which the system runs locally on the user's hardware, inherently ensures compliance with data protection regulations such as the GDPR. AISHE itself does not collect, transmit, or store any personal data centrally. All data processing and AI activities take place exclusively on the user's device, significantly reducing data protection risks. 
  • Role as a tool, not a market participant: AISHE positions itself as a neutral interface between the user and already regulated financial markets. It is expressly stated that AISHE assumes no responsibility for compliance with financial regulations; this responsibility remains with the licensed brokers who provide access to the markets. AISHE merely utilizes the existing, regulated infrastructure provided by these brokers. 
  • EU AI Act Classification: AISHE is designed and positioned as a specialized "single-purpose tool" for autonomous financial trading. It is not classified as General Purpose AI (GPAI). This distinction is crucial, as AISHE is therefore not subject to the most stringent obligations and regulatory burdens applicable to GPAI systems under the EU AI Act. 
  • Lex Specialis Principle: The project operates under the legal principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali (special law supersedes general law). This implies that existing, specific, and comprehensive financial regulations (e.g., those enforced by BaFin in Germany and other EU financial supervisory authorities) take precedence over the general framework of the new EU AI Act in areas where such specific regulations already exist. 
  • Hardware-dependent compliance scaling: AISHE dynamically adapts its complexity and risk tolerance to the user's hardware capabilities. On less powerful hardware, the system deliberately reduces its operational complexity and risk tolerance to ensure decisions can be made within the required processing time. This is a proactive design approach that helps avoid regulatory issues that could arise from delays or incomplete execution due to insufficient computing resources. 

 

4.2 User control in risk management

 

AISHE revolutionizes risk management in algorithmic trading by explicitly giving users complete control over all risk parameters. This philosophy is fully aligned with the principles of the EU AI Act, which emphasizes human oversight and control of AI systems, especially in high-risk applications such as finance. 

  • Full user control: In contrast to traditional trading systems, where AI autonomously controls risk management, AISHE explicitly positions itself as a tool where the user retains complete control over all risk parameters. 
  • Configurable parameters: AISHE offers extensive configuration options in its "Setup" and "Highway" sections, allowing users to precisely define their individual risk profile. This includes setting "Rally Times," configuring different trading sessions for European and US markets, defining the instruments to be traded, the size and volume of trades, and setting critical risk parameters such as take-profit and stop-loss levels and daily or session-based target amounts. 
  • AI execution within user limits: A crucial aspect of AISHE's risk management philosophy is the clear separation between user decisions and AI execution. While the AI makes trading decisions autonomously, these decisions are strictly based on the risk parameters defined by the user. AISHE does not independently interpret what is "safe" or "risky"; it follows the guidelines defined by the user with maximum precision. 
  • Proactive user adjustment: Since the user always retains control over the risk parameters, they can react proactively when market conditions change or the system exhibits behavior patterns that no longer align with their personal risk preferences. Continuous monitoring and, if necessary, adjustment of the risk parameters by the user ensures that the system always operates in line with individual requirements and counteracts model degradation over time. 
  • Hardware-aware risk assessment: AISHE considers the user's hardware capabilities when assessing risk. For example, slower computers may have difficulty processing complex state vectors in real time. AISHE incorporates this limitation into risk management by adjusting trading activity accordingly to ensure decisions can be made within the available processing time. 

 

4.3 Ethical attitude: Job transformation vs. elimination, avoiding distortions

 

AISHE addresses ethical considerations through a fundamental paradigm shift: Instead of operating as an autonomous entity that makes decisions without human supervision, AISHE explicitly positions itself as a tool in which the user retains complete control over all decision parameters. 

  • Clear separation of responsibility: AISHE's ethical philosophy is based on the clear separation between autonomous decision-making and human responsibility. Responsibility for all trading activities lies explicitly with the user, who opens a trading account with a licensed broker, sets all trading limits, risk parameters, and financial instruments, and bears sole legal and financial responsibility for all trading activities. AISHE acts as a sophisticated tool that executes decisions within these human-defined limits - a collaborative support, not a free agent. 
  • Local data processing: This is the foundation of ethical security. Since AISHE processes all information directly on the user's local computer and does not transmit or store personal data on central servers, data security and transparency are guaranteed. 
  • Hardware-dependent adaptation: Adapting AISHE to hardware capabilities ensures natural ethical scaling. On less powerful hardware, the system deliberately reduces its complexity and risk tolerance to ensure decisions can be made within the required time. This is a proactive approach to avoiding ethical issues that could arise from delays or incomplete execution. 
  • Transparency through a three-dimensional explanatory model: AISHE's three-tiered decision-making architecture (human factor, structural factor, relationship factor) is crucial for ethical acceptance. It enables users to understand the decision-making logic without getting lost in technical jargon. Reporting tools transform complex decision-making processes into visual representations that clarify the causal relationship between market conditions and trading decisions. 
  • Risk Avoidance: AISHE does not implement an automated trading system that seeks profit, but strictly adheres to the risk parameters defined by the user. This not only prevents ethical issues associated with excessive risk-taking but also ensures that the system operates in accordance with the user's individual requirements. 
  • Job transformation vs. elimination: The true ethical innovation of AISHE lies in the fact that it doesn't seek to replace human traders, but rather creates new forms of economic participation. Instead of eliminating jobs, it transforms the nature of work itself - from active participation to oversight of autonomous systems. This paradigm shift addresses growing concerns that AI will eliminate human jobs. 
  • Avoidance of biases: AISHE eliminates biases in trading decisions that could result from historical data. Because the system is not based on historical data analysis, but solely on real-time prices and self-generated state vectors, it avoids systematic biases that could result from past market situations. Continuous adaptation to current market situations ensures that the system does not become trapped in old patterns. 

The following table summarizes AISHE's approach to compliance and ethical responsibility:

Table 3: AISHE's compliance approach

Compliance area

AISHE's approach

Data protection (GDPR)

Local data processing; no collection/transmission/central storage of personal data; use of only broker-provided, compliant data.

Regulatory responsibility

Tool, not market participant; responsibility for financial regulations remains with licensed brokers; use of existing regulated infrastructure.

EU AI Act Classification

Specialized, single-purpose tool for autonomous financial trading; not classified as General Purpose AI (GPAI).

Legal principle

Operates under lex specialis derogat legi generali (specific financial law supersedes general AI law where applicable).

User control & supervision

Full user control over all risk parameters; AI executes strictly within user-defined limits; user bears sole legal/financial responsibility.

Avoiding distortions

No dependence on historical data; learns from real-time data and self-generated state vectors; continuously adapts to current market situations.

Ethical attitude to employment

Focus on workplace transformation (supervision role) rather than elimination; creates new forms of economic participation.

 

5. Strategic Assessment: Strengths, Challenges and Opportunities



5. Strengths

 

AISHE’s strategic positioning is underpinned by a number of significant strengths:

  • Unique decentralized architecture and local data processing: The "1 computer = 1 AISHE" principle and fully local data processing not only provide high data security and integrity but also low latency in decision-making, which is crucial in volatile financial markets. 
  • Self-financing model and financial independence: Over 16 years of self-financed development without external investors or loans demonstrates a robust and sustainable business model. This enables strategic autonomy and a long-term development perspective that is unaffected by short-term market fluctuations or investor expectations. 
  • Comprehensive user control and transparency: AISHE places full control over risk parameters in the hands of the user and offers a three-dimensional explanatory model (human, structural, and relationship factors) that makes decisions understandable. This builds trust and complies with European requirements for responsible AI. 
  • Long development history and proven technology: More than 16 years of research and development, supported by significant investments in IT infrastructure, result in a mature and tested system that is continuously adapting. 
  • Focus on social impact and job transformation: The vision of democratizing access to financial markets and creating new forms of economic participation positions AISHE as a solution to global challenges such as unemployment. This significantly expands the potential user base and offers compelling social value creation. 
  • Proprietary Knowledge Balance 2.0 Framework: This unique analytical model, which goes beyond traditional indicators and identifies causal relationships, represents a strong unique selling proposition and intellectual property. 
  • Hardware-adaptive performance optimization: The system's ability to dynamically adapt its complexity to the available hardware ensures functionality and efficiency under a wide range of technical conditions, increasing accessibility. 
  • Compliance with EU AI Act principles: The explicit alignment with the principles of the EU AI Act and the classification as a single-purpose tool minimize regulatory risks and provide a competitive advantage in the European market. 

 

5.2 Challenges

 

Despite its strengths, AISHE also faces specific challenges that must be considered for a comprehensive assessment:

  • Hardware Dependence for Optimal Performance: Although AISHE utilizes hardware dependency as a design feature, this means that achieving the highest returns requires powerful hardware. User expectations must be clearly managed in this regard to avoid disappointment for users with older systems. 
  • Required user training and configuration: AISHE is not a plug-and-play solution. To achieve optimal results, intensive training and careful configuration by the user over days or weeks are required. This represents an initial hurdle that requires commitment and patience from the user. 
  • Founder succession as a strategic transition point: The current search for a successor to the original developer and owner represents a critical transition point. While this offers opportunities for growth, it also carries the risk of a loss of vision or a slowdown in development if a suitable successor is not found. 
  • "No historical data" paradigm: While the lack of historical data avoids bias, it also means that each AISHE instance must essentially build its knowledge in real time or through federated learning. This requires robust real-time learning mechanisms and a mandatory demo training phase to individually optimize system performance. 

 

5.3 Opportunities

 

AISHE has significant opportunities to further expand its market position and realize its vision:

  • Global market expansion through the decentralized distributor model: The established "franchise-like" model enables cost-efficient and scalable global expansion. By shifting operational costs and risks to local partners, AISHE can exponentially increase its reach without burdening the centralized structure. 
  • Development of new revenue streams: In addition to the subscription model, there is potential in licensing the technology to other companies, selling anonymized and aggregated data to financial or research institutions, providing consulting services from the founding team, and providing training and seminars. 
  • Potential for broader economic participation: Positioning AISHE as a tool to combat unemployment and create new income-generating opportunities (e.g., for students, homemakers, telecommuters) opens up a huge, previously untapped market. This could create a new class of "AI-assisted freelancers" who contribute to economic stability. 
  • Integration into future operating systems: AISHE's decentralized architecture, which hybridizes local and cloud intelligence, could play a pioneering role in the integration of autonomous systems into future operating systems (such as Microsoft's AI-native OS Vision). This would further increase market efficiency and reduce information asymmetry. 
  • Strengthening its position as a pioneer for responsible AI in finance: By consistently adhering to European regulatory principles (user control, transparency, data protection), AISHE can build trust and establish itself as a leading example of ethically responsible AI applications in the financial sector. 

 

Overall Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

 

The AISHE project presents itself as a mature, strategically independent, and technologically advanced autonomous trading system with the potential to fundamentally transform interaction with financial markets and the future of work. Its unique positioning stems from a combination of features that distinguish it from traditional and many modern AI solutions:

The decentralized architecture and local data processing are not just technical specifications, but fundamental design decisions that significantly shape data security, the speed of decision-making, and regulatory compliance, especially with regard to the GDPR and the EU AI Act. This structure eliminates central attack vectors and creates a high degree of trust and control for the user.

The self-financing model over 16 years, with an investment of approximately €12 million from the system's own revenues, is a remarkable testament to the project's financial viability and strategic independence. This autonomy enables a long-term vision and development, free from the short-term constraints of external investors.

User-centered control over risk parameters and the transparency provided by the three-pronged explanatory model are crucial for ethical acceptance and compliance with European AI principles. AISHE acts as a sophisticated tool that does not replace human oversight and responsibility, but rather complements and strengthens them.

Evaluating AISHE's performance requires a shift from universal benchmarks to an individualized, hardware-dependent approach. The system's ability to adapt its complexity to the available computing power is a conscious design decision that promotes accessibility and broad applicability. The impressive illustrative returns achieved under optimal conditions underscore the potential, but require significant user engagement during the initial training and configuration phase.

The social dimension of AISHE, particularly the democratization of access to financial markets and the creation of new forms of economic participation, is not just a positive side effect but an integral part of the business strategy. It opens up enormous market opportunities by appealing to a broad user base seeking flexible income opportunities and positions AISHE as a solution to the challenges of automation in the labor market.

The current search for a successor to the founder represents a crucial transition point. This offers a unique opportunity for a new entrepreneur or team to take over a mature, financially stable, and strategically well-positioned project with proven technology and a clear growth roadmap.

Strategic recommendations:

  1. For potential successors and strategic partners: It is strongly recommended to emphasize AISHE's long-term vision and financial independence as core values. The project offers a rare opportunity to acquire a technological product that already generates stable cash flow and has proven itself, without the burden of external debt or investors. Social impact and alignment with responsible AI principles should be emphasized as unique selling points and differentiators in the market.
  2. For future product development and user support: Given the need for intensive user training and configuration, continued investment in comprehensive, easily accessible onboarding materials and support structures should be made. This can shorten the initial learning curve and maximize user success rates, which in turn promotes adoption and growth.
  3. For market positioning: The narratives of "AI for economic participation" and "human-in-control AI" should be consistently embedded in communication. This not only differentiates AISHE from competitors but also addresses key concerns of the public and regulators regarding the impact of AI on work and society.
  4. For technological advancement: The principles of federated learning should be further developed to strengthen the collective intelligence of the system. At the same time, adaptive adaptation to different hardware capabilities should be maintained as a strategic advantage and communicated transparently to ensure broad accessibility.

In summary, AISHE is not just an advanced trading system, but a model for developing and scaling AI solutions that pursue both economic success and societal benefit. It embodies a vision in which AI does not eliminate jobs but creates new income opportunities and redefines the future of work.

 

 

References 

#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !